February 12-18
Week 7, “The Offering”

Discussion Questions

Old Testament

  1. Why does God caution the Israelites to have nothing to do with the foreigners they will encounter (Exodus 34:11-16)?
  2. Why did God require the fire on the altar to be kept burning; and not allowed to go out? (Leviticus 6:12-13)?

New Testament

  1. What do we make of the message from the wife of Pontius Pilate? Matthew 27:19
  2. Why did Pontius Pilate wash his hands after ordering that Jesus be crucified (Matthew 27:24)?
  3. What are the consequences of the Jews saying His blood be on us and on our children: Are any/all of these views on the Jews guilt really just disguised anti-semitism?? Is it a fair statement to say that the Jews killed Christ? Matthew 27:25
  4. What is the importance of the Resurrection to Christians? Matthew 28:1-10

Notes and Commentary

Old Testament

Why does God caution the Israelites to have nothing to do with the foreigners they will encounter? (Exodus 34:11-16) Is this instruction contrary to what Jesus Christ later says is the second most important commandment--“You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:39 ESV)?
Exodus 34:11-16 (NIV) [11] Obey what I command you today. I will drive out before you the Amorites, Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. [12] Be careful not to make a treaty with those who live in the land where you are going, or they will be a snare among you. [13] Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones and cut down their Asherah poles. [14] Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.  [15] “Be careful not to make a treaty with those who live in the land; for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to them, they will invite you and you will eat their sacrifices. [16] And when you choose some of their daughters as wives for your sons and those daughters prostitute themselves to their gods, they will lead your sons to do the same.
God knew the people would imitate the bad behavior of these foreign people. He knew if these enemies weren’t destroyed they would “be the means of drawing them into the same sinful practices with themselves, especially into idolatrous ones, and so of bringing ruin and destruction on them.”
[Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament] The warning against friendship with the idolatrous Canaanites (Exo 34:11-16) is more fully developed and more strongly enforced than in Exo 23:23. The Israelites, when received into the covenant with Jehovah, were not only to beware of forming any covenant with the inhabitants of Canaan (cf. Exo 23:32-33), but were to destroy all the signs of their idolatrous worship, such as altars, monuments (see Exo 23:24), and asherim, the idols of Astarte, the Canaanitish goddess of nature, which consisted for the most part of wooden pillars (see my Comm. on 1Ki 14:23), and to worship no other god, because Jehovah was called jealous, i.e., had revealed Himself as jealous (see at Exo 20:5), and was a jealous God. This was commanded, that the Israelites might not suffer themselves to be led astray by such an alliance; to go a whoring after their gods, and sacrifice to them, to take part in their sacrificial festivals, or to marry their sons to the daughters of the Canaanites, by whom they would be persuaded to join in the worship of idols. The use of the expression "go a whoring" [A]  [A] The King James Version renders Exodus 34:15 as, “Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice.” in a spiritual sense, in relation to idolatry, is to be accounted for on the ground, that the religious fellowship of Israel with Jehovah was a covenant resembling the marriage tie; and we meet with it for the first time, here, immediately after the formation of this covenant between Israel and Jehovah. The phrase is all the more expressive on account of the literal prostitution that was frequently associated with the worship of Baal and Astarte (cf. Lev 17:7; Lev 20:5-6; Num 14:33, etc.). We may see from Num 25:1. how Israel was led astray by this temptation in the wilderness.
Ultimately, the Israelites did not follow God’s orders. Of course what God told them would happen did happen.
Why did God require the fire on the altar to be kept burning; and not allowed to go out? (Leviticus 6:12-13)?
[Kretzmann Popular Commentary] It signified the continual, uninterrupted fellowship of the children of Israel with the covenant God. In the heart of the Christians the flame of love toward God should burn at all times with unabated vigor, until the worshiper passes from believing to seeing.
[Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible] The priest must take care of the fire upon the altar. The first fire upon the altar came from heaven, Lev. 9:24; by keeping that up continually, all their sacrifices might be said to be consumed with the fire from heaven, in token of God’s acceptance. Thus should the fire of our holy affections, the exercise of our faith and love, of prayer and praise, be without ceasing.
[Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible] We may suppose that no day passed without some extraordinary sacrifices, which were always offered between the morning and evening lamb; so that from morning to night the fire on the altar was kept up of course. But to preserve it all night unto the morning ( 9) required some care. Those that keep good houses never let their kitchen fire go out; therefore God would thus give an instance of his good house-keeping. The first fire upon the altar came from heaven (ix. 24) [B]  [B] See Leviticus 9:22-24 (KJV). [22] And Aaron lifted up his hand toward the people, and blessed them, and came down from offering of the sin offering, and the burnt offering, and peace offerings.  [23] And Moses and Aaron went into the tabernacle of the congregation, and came out, and blessed the people: and the glory of the LORD appeared unto all the people.  [24] And there came a fire out from before the LORD, and consumed upon the altar the burnt offering and the fat: which when all the people saw, they shouted, and fell on their faces., so that by keeping that up continually with a constant supply of fuel all their sacrifices throughout all their generations might be said to be consumed with that fire from heaven, in token of God’s acceptance. If, through carelessness, they should ever let it go out, they could not expect to have it so kindled again. Accordingly the Jews tell us that the fire never did go out upon the altar, till the captivity in Babylon. This is referred to Isa. xxxi. 9, where God is said to have his fire in Zion, and his furnace in Jerusalem. By this law we are taught to keep up in our minds a constant disposition to all acts of piety and devotion, an habitual affection to divine things, so as to be always ready to every good word and work. We must not only not quench the Spirit, but we must stir up the gift that is in us. Though we be not always sacrificing, yet we must keep the fire of holy love always burning; and thus we must pray always.
Note the seriousness of disregarding God’s command in this matter. The sons of Aaron were killed for violation of God’s rule:
Leviticus 10: 1-2: (WEBME). [1] Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, each took his censer, and put fire in it, and laid incense on it, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he had not commanded them.  [2] Fire came out from before the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.

New Testament

What do we make of the message from the wife of Pontius Pilate?

Matthew 27:19 (WEB). “When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.”
[Barnes’ New Testament Notes] The word “just” here has the sense of innocent; or not guilty. She might have been satisfied of his innocence from other sources, as well as from the dream. It is possible that the woman might have been a worshiper of the true God, and that she might therefore have desired that the Messiah should be released. I have suffered many things, etc. Dreams were occasionally considered as indications of the Divine will; and, among the Romans and Greeks, as well as the Jews, great reliance was placed on them. Her mind-- probably agitated with the subject; satisfied of the innocence of Jesus; and knowing that the Jews would make every effort to secure his condemnation--was also excited during her sleep, perhaps with a frightful prospect of the judgments that would descend on the family of Pilate if Jesus was condemned. She therefore sent to him to secure if possible his release.
[Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible] There is no doubt that God had appeared unto this woman, testifying the innocence of Christ, and showing the evils which should pursue Pilate if this innocent blood should be shed by his authority.
[The New John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible ] Her name, according to the Ethiopians, was Abrokla ; who might be a Jewess, as the wife of Felix was, Ac 24:24, and a favourer of Jesus, or, at least, a religious person; and if, only a mere Heathen, yet had some notion of justice being to be done; and however, pressed by her dream, sent a messenger to her husband, as he was trying this cause... Some have thought, that this dream was from the devil, willing to hinder the death of Christ, and so man’s redemption and salvation by it; but had he had any such intention, the most effectual method would have been to have persuaded the chief priests and elders off of it, and in attempting it; whereas, on the contrary, they were instigated by him to it: and whatever natural causes there might be of this dream, as the chief priests coming over night to desire a band of soldiers to take Jesus, and the discourse they might have with Pilate about him; which things might run in her mind in her sleep; yet, doubtless, this was of God, and with a design that a testimony should be bore to the innocency of Christ every way; as by Judas that betrayed him, by Pilate his judge, and by his wife.
[Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible] Pilate’s lady sent him this warning, out of the love she had to him; she feared not a rebuke from him for meddling with that which belonged not to her; but, let him take it how he would, she would give him the caution. Note, It is an instance of true love to our friends and relations, to do what we can to keep them from sin; and the nearer any are to us, and the greater affection we have for them, the more solicitous we should be not to suffer sin to come or lie upon them.
What are the consequences of the Jews saying His blood be on us and on our children: Are any/all of these views on the Jews guilt really just disguised anti-semitism?? Is it a fair statement to say that the Jews killed Christ? Matthew 27:25
Matthew 27:24-25 (WEB). [24] When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. [25] Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
[THE PEOPLE’S NEW TESTAMENT] His blood [be] on us. That is, let us have the responsibility and suffer the punishment. A fearful legacy, and awfully inherited. The history of the Jews from that day on has been the darkest recorded in human annals.
[John Wesley’s Notes on the Bible] ...it was peculiarly fulfilled by Titus the Roman general, on the Jews whom he took during the siege of Jerusalem. So many, after having been scourged in a terrible manner, were crucified all round the city, that in a while there was not room near the wall for the crosses to stand by each other.
[Barnes’ New Testament Notes] To this day, also, the curse has remained. They have been a nation scattered and peeled; persecuted almost everywhere, and a hissing and a by-word among men. No single nation probably has suffered so much; and yet they have been preserved. All classes of men; all the governments of the earth, have conspired to overwhelm them with calamity, and yet they still live as monuments of the justice of God, and as proofs, going down from age to age, that the Christian religion is true-- standing demonstrations of the crime of their fathers in putting the Messiah to death, and in calling down vengeance on their heads.

What is the importance of the Resurrection to Christians?

Matthew 28:1-10 (WEB). [1] Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. [2] Behold, there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from the sky, and came and rolled away the stone from the door, and sat on it. [3] His appearance was like lightning, and his clothing white as snow. [4] For fear of him, the guards shook, and became like dead men. [5] The angel answered the women, “Don’t be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus, who has been crucified. [6] He is not here, for he has risen, just like he said. Come, see the place where the Lord was lying. [7] Go quickly and tell his disciples, ‘He has risen from the dead, and behold, he goes before you into Galilee; there you will see him.’ Behold, I have told you.” [8] They departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy, and ran to bring his disciples word. [9] As they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, “Rejoice!” They came and took hold of his feet, and worshiped him. [10] Then Jesus said to them, “Don’t be afraid. Go tell my brothers that they should go into Galilee, and there they will see me.”
The resurrection is the key to the Christian faith. It is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy (Psalm 16:10) and of Jesus’ statements (Matthew 20:19; John 10:18). The resurrection is verified by the Bible itself in several ways: (1) by the eleven apostles: “To them he presented himself alive after his passion by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days, and speaking of the kingdom of God.” (Acts 1:3); (2) by Paul (Acts 9:3-8; 1 Corinthians 15:8; Galatians 1:12); by the five hundred Christian brothers (1 Corinthians 15:6); and by Thomas, who wanted to see proof (John 20:24-29). [C]  [C] There are many other sources for external/historical proof of resurrection.

Zombie Connection in the Bible? By Tom Truex

I am a Christian who is a fan of the zombie genre of fiction. I wish there was a scriptural basis to justify my interest in this “art” form. So I ask, “Does Matthew 27:51-53 give rise to the zombie mythology in popular culture, particularly films, such as Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, etc?”
[51b]The earth quaked and the rocks were split. [52] The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; [53] and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection, they entered into the holy city and appeared to many. Matthew 27:51-53 (WEB)
Alas, the zombies of pop culture have nothing to do with the people resurrected in this Bible story. First of all, zombies are almost always portrayed as being reanimated shortly after dying from the bite of another zombie. Zombies don’t usually “come out of their graves.” [D]  [D] There is no standard definition of zombies, nor universally accepted manual of their origin and behavior. There actually is at least one popular manual to zombie origin and behavior, but it is not universally accepted. Max Brooks, The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead (New York, Three Rivers Press, 2003). In the movie, Return of the Living Dead (1985), the zombies are re-animated by both the bites of other zombies and a sort of acid raid. Zombie fluid rains on a cemetery. In a matter of minutes, zombie juice seeps through dirt and into the coffins below. The buried residents climb out of their coffins and through six feet of soil to reach the surface (the tombs referenced in the Bible in Matthew are above ground vaults). Needless to say, escaping from a coffin and climbing through dirt as easily as swimming in the ocean defies the laws of physics. Of course, an important consideration in the whole zombie genre of fiction is that you must necessarily suspend certain rules of nature and/or physics. Cf. The “zombies” in Re-Animator (1985)--who some will argue are technically not zombies, but rather “reanimated” dead--brought back to life by a mysterious florescent fluid, injected via hypodermic needle. Also note other variations on the theme, such as 28 Days Later (2002), and 28 Weeks Later (2007) in which a virus transforms the living into flesh eating zombies. But, more importantly, zombies are almost exclusively evil, flesh eating monsters. The tagline for one popular zombie movie says, “when there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth.” [E]  [E] Dawn of the Dead (2004). Conversely, the reanimated individuals in Matthew 27:51-53 are referred to a “saints.” The context and description of their “resurrection” all indicate these “saints” were brought back from the dead in positive demonstration of God’s power—not as some other-worldly abomination. Barclay’s commentary [F]  [F] William Barclay’s Study Bible Series Reference Files says,
“The tombs were opened. The symbolism of this is that Jesus conquered death. In dying and in rising again he destroyed the power of the grave. Because of his life, his death and his resurrection, the tomb has lost its power, and the grave has lost its terror, and death has lost its tragedy. For we are certain that because he lives we shall live also.”
Matthew Henry’s commentary notes that the incident in Matthew 27:52-53 raises more questions than it answers. Specifically, who were these saints? Some say ancient patriarchs, though others maintain they were modern saints, recently departed. And we can’t be sure whether the people who were resurrected, lived and testified to God’s greatness, before dying again, by natural means, and being buried a second time; or whether they ascended into Heaven with Christ. [G]  [G] Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible
Jamieson’s commentary takes the latter view:
It must be observed, however, that the resurrection of these sleeping saints was not like those of the widow of Nain’s son, of Jairus’ daughter, of Lazarus, and of the man who "revived and stood upon his feet," on his dead body touching the bones of Elisha (2 Kings 13:21) —which were mere temporary recallings of the departed spirit to the mortal body, to be followed by a final departure of it "till the trumpet shall sound." But this was a resurrection once for all, to life everlasting; and so there is no room to doubt that they went to glory with their Lord, as bright trophies of His victory over death. [H]  [H] Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
Conclusion: it’s difficult to know what inspires fiction writers or film makers. Perhaps some of them have Biblical resurrection in mind as they write fictional stories about zombies. Dead people did rise from their graves in Matthew 27:51-53. But it’s safe to say that the people who were resurrected in this Bible story were not the same as zombies of popular culture and modern movies.

Random Quotes

"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error."
— unknown
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."
— Mark Twain (1835-1910), Letter to Mrs Foote, Dec. 2, 1887
"Beware of the young doctor and the old barber."
— Benjamin Franklin (1706 – 1790)
"Better late than early."
— Tom Truex
"Being stupid is its own reward"
— unknown

Notes:

© Tom Truex 2014, Davie, FL